November 22, 2023
E | clerk@153phillip.com.au
P | 02 9132 5711Sue Chrysanthou SC is a leading defamation barrister whose practice also includes intellectual property matters, inquiries, breach of confidence and privacy disputes. She was called to the bar in 2004 and was appointed Senior Counsel in 2020.
She actively participates in law reform and frequently speaks about issues relating to defamation, freedom of speech, open justice, privacy and the media. Sue has acted in a number of key cases for plaintiffs and defendants including Rush v Nationwide News, Hanson-Young v Leyonhjelm, Herron v HarperCollins, Schiff v Nine, Lehrmann v Wilkinson and Deeming v Pesutto.
As a parent, pet owner, beekeeper, baker, wildlife carer and alleged amateur breakdancer, Sue offers a range of perspectives on legal and non-legal issues.
Communications and Media Law
Confidential Information
Contracts
Defamation
Intellectual Property
Privacy Law
Suppression and non-publication orders
Trade Practices
Masters of Laws (UNSW)
BComm(Media Arts & Production)/BLaws(First Class Honours) UTS
Senior Counsel – 2020
Barrister – 2004
Ranked in Doyles Guide as a Leading Defamation Senior Counsel - NSW, 2026
Ranked in Doyles Guide as a Leading Technology, Media & Telecommunications Senior Counsel - Australia, 2023 and 2024
Ranked in Doyles Guide as a Leading Technology, Media & Telecommunications Senior Counsel - NSW, since 2021
Ranked in Doyles Guide as a Leading Technology, Media & Telecommunications Junior Counsel - NSW, 2016, 2019 and 2020
Received a Spotlight in the Chambers and Partners, Media & Defamation: The Bar | Asia-Pacific 2026
Recognised in Best Lawyers 2027 Release for Litigation
November 22, 2023
Richard was admitted as a solicitor in NSW in 1991 (having practised commercial litigation in London as a UK solicitor for 8 years) and spent 14 years with DLA Phillips Fox (now DLA Piper), heading the insurance litigation Team in Sydney between 2000-2005, practising in professional indemnity, insurance disputes and media law.
Richard was called to the NSW Bar in 2005 and is well regarded for his advocacy and advice work in all aspects of commercial litigation, equity, insurance disputes and media law (including advising and appearing for media publishers on issues of defamation, contempt, suppression and copyright).
Richard was appointed Senior Counsel in 2020.
Richard is an AMDRAS accredited mediator (2022). He brings over three decades of commercial and insurance litigation experience to his mediation practice, providing parties with insight informed by extensive courtroom and advisory work.
Richard mediates commercial disputes, insurance matters, and defamation cases. His litigation background enables him to assess risk and identify practical solutions, while his collaborative approach helps parties reach sustainable resolutions.
Richard lectures part-time in the LLM program at the University of New South Wales, contributing to the education of the next generation of commercial lawyers.
Defamation and Media
Insurance
Professional Liability
Commercial
Corporations
Equity and Trusts
Channel Seven v Manock (2007) 232 CLR 245
LVMH Watch & Jewellery Australia Pty Ltd v Lassanah & Ors [2011] NSWCA 370
Papaconstuntinas v Holmes a Court [2012] 249 CLR 534
Bleyer v Google [2014] 88 NSWLR 670
Kidu v Fifer [2016] NSWSC 982
Accommodation West Pty Ltd v Aikman [2017] WASC 157
Murray v Raynor [2019] NSWCA 274
Stoltenberg v Bolton; Loder v Bolton [2020] NSWCA 45
JWR Productions Australia Pty Ltd v Duncan-Watt (No 2) [2020] FCA 236
Gough v Squillacioti [2021] NSWDC 411
Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Voller [2021] HCA 27
Dutton v Bazzi [2021] FCA 1474
Sydney Cosmetic Clinic v Hu [2022] NSWCA 1
Peros v Nationwide News [2024] QSC 80
Solicitor (UK) 1983
Solicitor (NSW) 1991
Barrister (NSW) 2005
Senior Counsel (NSW) 2020
potter@153phillip.com.au
+61 29 132 5721
November 22, 2023
E | smark@smark.com.au
P | 02 9132 5713Kieran Smark SC was admitted to the Bar in 1991 and was appointed Senior Counsel in 2007.
He is a leading defamation barrister but also practices in commercial, property and administrative law matters. He often speaks on matters involving defamation and court procedure and is the author of Freedom of Information and Privacy in Australia (3rd ed, 2025, Lexis Nexis). He has represented plaintiffs and defendants in various matters including Leyonhjelm v Hanson-Young, Greenwich v Latham and Faruqi v Hanson.
Download CV here.
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Appellate
Class Actions & Representative Proceedings
Commercial Litigation
Commissions and Inquiries
Confidential Information
Corporate
Defamation
Equity
Intellectual Property
Media Law
Privacy Law
Professional Conduct
Property Law/Commercial/Retail & Real Property
Regulatory
Suppression and non-publication orders
Trusts
Wills & Estates; Family Provision Act; Probate
Freedom of Information and Privacy in Australia, 3rd edition
Senior Counsel – 2007
Barrister – 1991
LLB (Hons) University of Sydney
Ranked in Doyles Guide as a Leading Technology, Media & Telecommunications Senior Counsel – Australia, 2024
Ranked in Doyles Guide as a Leading Technology, Media & Telecommunications Senior Counsel - NSW, since 2018
Recognised in Best Lawyers for Defamation and Media Law since 2021
November 22, 2023
Matthew’s primary area of expertise is in privacy and media and defamation law. He has extensive trial experience and is retained for urgent applications involving injunctive relief and suppression orders. He appears for defamation plaintiffs and defendants and gives pre-publication advice.
Since 2022 Matthew has been the Co-Chair of the NSW Bar Association Media and Information Law and Technology which amongst other masters assists the NSW Bar in advising on law reform in the defamation, privacy and AI spaces.Matthew has been appeared in actions involving both mass media and social media.Recent matters for plaintiffs include:
Lehrmann v Network Ten Pty Ltd (Trial Judgment) [2024] FCA 369
Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 41) [2023] FCA 555
Chau v Fairfax Media Publications[2019] FCA 185, Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Chau Chak Wing [2019] FCAFC 125
Chris Gayle v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd[2017] NSWSC 1261, Fairfax Media Publications v Gayle [2019] NSWCA 172
Ben Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 2) [2019] FCA 1626
McLachlan v Browne (No 8)[2018] NSWSC 1968, McLachlan v Browne (No 7) [2018] NSWSC 1914
Bolton v Stoltenberg[2018] NSWSC 1518
Matthew has also appeared in the Supreme and District Courts of NSW and Federal Court of Australia for media defendants including Channel Nine, Channel Seven, Google and Harbour Radio. Recent matters include:
Greiss v Seven Network (Operations) Ltd (No 2) [2024] FCA 98
Molan v Dailymail.com Australia Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 1004; Dailymail.com Australia Pty Ltd v Molan [2023] FCAFC 26
Nassif v Seven Network (Operations) Ltd [2021] FCA 1286
TCN Channel Nine v Pahuja[2019] NSWCA 166
KT v Google LLC[2019] NSWSC 1015
Mohareb v Harbour Radio Pty Limited; Mohareb v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited; Mohareb v State of NSW[2019] NSWSC 270
Noble v Phillips (No 3) [2019] NSWSC 110
Parizian v Seven Network Limited [2018] NSWDC 296
The New Privacy Tort's Contentious Exemption: The 'Character of News' (June 2025) Law Society Journal
What is a Serious Invasion of Privacy? UK Case Law Has the Answers (April 2025) Law Society Journal
Melania Trump, Her Husband and US Defamation Law (June 2017), Communications Law Bulletin
A Shot in the Arm for the Defence of Contextual Truth as Attention Turns to Particulars of Justification, (February 2017), Seminar given at UNSW
The Defence of Contextual Truth and Hore Lacy: Struggling but Still Standing (March 2015)
Ranked in Doyles Guide Leading Defamation Law Barristers – Australia, 2026.
Ranked in Doyles Guide as a Leading Technology, Media & Telecommunications Senior Counsel - NSW, 2026
richardson@153phillip.com.au
+61 2 9132 5716
November 22, 2023
Peter Gray was admitted to the Bar in 1986, and appointed Senior Counsel in 2003.
He has a wide general practice, notably in the commercial and common law fields, as well as in criminal law. He is a recognised leader in defamation and media law, and has appeared in many prominent cases in those areas. He also has extensive experience in the conduct of commissions of inquiry both state and federal.
He is an experienced mediator, having conducted numerous mediations since the early 1990s. He is accredited pursuant to the National Standards and is on the panels of mediators approved by the NSW Supreme and District Courts.
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Appellate
Commercial
Commissions of Inquiry
Criminal
Defamation and Privacy
Equity
Commissioner of State Revenue v Gleeson
[2024] FCA 908 – Corporations Law, Insolvency, Payroll Tax
Mr Gray led John Gooley, also of 153 Phillip, for the NSW Commissioner of State Revenue in these multi-party Federal Court proceedings. The Commissioner was successful in having a Deed of Company Arrangement terminated on the grounds of injustice and that it was contrary to the interests of creditors: Corporations Act s. 445D(1)(e) and (f)(ii).
Special Commission of Inquiry into LGBTIQ hate crimes –
2022/23 – Crime
Mr Gray was Senior Counsel Assisting the Special Commission throughout 2022 and 2023.
Kazal v Thunder Studios Inc (California)
[2023] FCAFC 174; [2022] FCA 110 – Defamation, Injurious Falsehood, Misleading and Deceptive Conduct.
Mr Gray’s clients were awarded damages totalling over $1.5 million for a series of indefensible publications on various websites and social media sites. The respondents’ appeal to the Full Federal Court was dismissed.
V’landys v Australian Broadcasting Corporation
[2023] FCAFC 80 – Defamation
Mr Gray appeared for the ABC, the successful respondent in the Full Federal Court. The appellant, Mr V’landys, had sued the ABC over a “Four Corners” program about cruelty to racehorses.
Duma v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 3)
[2022] FCA 47 – Defamation
Mr Gray’s client, William Duma, a Cabinet Minister in the Government of PNG, was awarded damages of $465,000, including aggravated damages, over a series of defamatory articles in the Australian Financial Review.
Bazzi v Dutton
[2022] FCAFC 84 – Defamation
Mr Gray appeared in the Full Federal Court for the successful appellant, Mr Bazzi, who had published a tweet about the then Defence Minister Mr Dutton. The Court overturned a finding by the trial judge that an imputation pleaded by Mr Dutton was conveyed by Mr Bazzi’s tweet.
Gould v Jordan ( No 2) [2021] FCA 1289 – Defamation
Mr Gray appeared for the successful respondent, Mr Jordan, the Commissioner of Taxation, who had made some remarks referable to Mr Gould in the course of an address to the National Press Club. The Federal Court upheld Mr Jordan’s qualified privilege defence (reply to attack).
Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd & Ors v Voller
(2021) 273 CLR 347; [2021] HCA 27
– Defamation
Mr Gray appeared for Mr Voller both in the NSW Court of Appeal (105 NSWLR 83) and subsequently in the High Court. Mr Voller was successful in both appeals. Various media companies were found to be the ‘publishers’ of comments posted by third parties to the Facebook pages of those media companies.
Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Vass
[2018] 98 NSWLR 672; [2018] NSWCA 259 – Offers of amends; offers of compromise
Mr Gray appeared for the successful respondent in the NSW Court of Appeal. An offer of amends under the Defamation Act was held capable of acceptance by a plaintiff even after the plaintiff had made an offer of compromise (of a higher amount) under UCPR r. 20.26.
Jane Doe v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd
[2018] NSWSC 1996 – Breach of confidence; breach of statutory duty
Mr Gray appeared for the defendant publishers who defeated claims of breach of confidence, and breach of statutory duty, arising from a newspaper article about criminal proceedings.
O’Brien v ABC
[2018] 97 NSWLR 1; [2017] NSWCA 338 – Defamation
Mr Gray appeared for the successful defendant, the ABC, both at first instance and on appeal, in defamation proceedings about a ‘Media Watch’ programme.
Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse – 2013 to 2017
Mr Gray was leading counsel for a large institution over the five-year course of the Royal Commission.
Khalid v Legal Aid Commission of NSW
[2016] NSWSC 1640 – Administrative Law
Mr Gray appeared for a prisoner, accused of terrorism offences, who sought judicial review of a decision by the Legal Aid Commisssion.
McBride v Christies Australia Pty Ltd
[2014] NSWSC 1729; [2015] NSWSC 754 – Equity
Mr Gray’s client, a successful defendant, obtained orders for indemnity costs in proceedings in which allegations against her of breach of fiduciary and other duties, in connection with works by well-known artists, were dismissed.
Dye v Commonwealth Securities Limited & Ors
[2012] FCA 242;[2012] FCA 407
Mr Gray appeared for the successful respondents in lengthy and complex Federal Court proceedings involving defamation, injurious falsehood, sexual harassment, discrimination and trade practices claims, all of which were dismissed and indemnity costs awarded.Mr Gray is a co-author of the “Defamation” title in Halsbury’s Laws of Australia.
He has published and presented numerous papers and seminars.Ranked in Doyles Guide Leading Defamation Law Barristers – Australia, 2026.
Ranked in Doyles Guide as a Leading Technology, Media & Telecommunications Senior Counsel - NSW, 2026
Bachelor of Arts (Hons) (Sydney) 1976
Bachelor of Laws (Sydney) 1978
Master of Laws (London) 1982
NSW BAR ADMISSION:1986
APPOINTED SC:2003gray@153phillip.com.au
+61 2 9132 5718
May 20, 2025
Anthony Franklin is a commercial barrister specialising primarily in intellectual property with extensive international experience.
• Called to the bar in South Africa in 1982 – granted silk in 1996• Called to the NSW bar in 1998 – granted silk in 2003• Called to the London bar in 2002 (Lincoln’s Inn)
In South Africa, Anthony has appeared in a large number of leading patent, copyright, trade mark and designs cases. He came to Australia in 1998 as one of South Africa’s leading intellectual property senior counsel.
In Australia, Anthony has established a substantial intellectual property practice, with a particular emphasis on patent litigation, but including copyright, trade marks and designs.
In 2004 to 2005 he practised in London as a member of Hogarth Chambers in Lincoln’s Inn, one of the UK’s leading intellectual property sets of barristers. He returned to Sydney at the end of 2005, although he continues to take briefs in South Africa and the United Kingdom. He has door Chambers in South Africa (Circle Chambers, Pretoria) and in London (Hogarth Chambers).
Throughout Anthony’s practice his main specialism has been patent litigation. He has appeared in a large number of reported patent cases in diverse fields including pharmaceutical (biotechnology and organic chemistry), engineering (mechanical, mining, chemical and electrical), gaming technology and consumer goods.
Anthony also takes briefs in other fields and he has appeared in a variety of general commercial cases often involving contractual disputes in areas of complicated technology.
He also has extensive arbitration experience. He is the founder and member of IPACSA (The Intellectual Property Arbitration Centre South Africa).
Commercial law
Intellectual property
Information technology
Professional negligence
Trade practices
Arbitration
BA LLB (University of Witwatersrand)
Claude Franks Memorial Prize (top student, Jurisprudence and Conflict of Laws).Australia
Intellectual Property Committee of the Law Council of Australia
Copyright Society of Australia
Intellectual Property Society of Australia and New Zealand
South Africa
Pretoria Society of Advocates
Circle Chambers (Brooklyn, Pretoria)
United Kingdom
Lincolns Inn
Hogarth Chambers (5 New Square, Lincoln’s Inn)Flexibility vs Certainty in Patent Law – Australia vs UK and South Africa (Intellectual Property Forum, Issue 58, September 2004)
Pick a Principle – A Provocative Look at Patent Claim Construction in Australia (Intellectual Property Forum, Issue 67, December 2006)
Profile – In Conversation with Anthony Franklin SC (Intellectual Property Forum, Issue 71, December 2007)
“In the Light of” Common General Knowledge – Obviousness after the Full Court Decision in AstraZeneca v Apotex (Intellectual Property Forum, Issue 98, September 2014)NSW BAR ADMISSION: 1998APPOINTED SC: 2003franklin@153phillip.com.au
+61 4 34 438 635
+61 2 9132 5726